Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CO 175/21 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses divorce case for lack of jurisdiction due to missing defendant's residence proof.

Numero d'incarto V CO 175/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's request to designate a competent court for a divorce proceeding. The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of the defendant's residence within the court's territorial jurisdiction. Consequently, the court ruled that no specific court could be designated to hear the case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ustawa o postępowaniu w sprawach rodzinnych; Art. 10 ust. 1: A divorce case cannot be designated to a specific court if the defendant's residence cannot be established within the court's territorial jurisdiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
divorce proceedings territorial jurisdiction defendant residence family law procedure competent court designation lack of evidence Supreme Court ruling

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Ustawa o postępowaniu w sprawach rodzinnych

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CO 175/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 listopada 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela w sprawie z wniosku A. P. R.‎przy uczestnictwie Z. G. R.‎o rozwód,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej ‎w dniu 4 listopada 2021 r.,‎wniosku o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy odrzuca wniosek. UZASADNIENIE