Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CNP 13/13 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal to review lower court's civil judgment for legal inconsistency.

Numero d'incarto V CNP 13/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the appeal against a final civil judgment rendered by the District Court in C. on October 18, 2012. The case involves a dispute between Bank S.A. in W. and J. K.o regarding a payment claim. The court decided to admit the appeal for examination because the lower court's ruling was alleged to be inconsistent with the law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 389 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 390 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit an appeal against a final judgment if the appellant demonstrates that the lower court's decision is inconsistent with the law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
civil appeal procedure legal inconsistency review final judgment challenge Supreme Court jurisdiction payment claim dispute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 389 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 390 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CNP 13/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 grudnia 2013 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Zbigniew Kwaśniewski w sprawie ze skargi J. K.o stwierdzenie niezgodności z prawem prawomocnego wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w C.‎z dnia 18 października 2012 r., sygn. akt VI Ca […], w sprawie z powództwa Banku […] S.A. w W. […] Oddziału w C.‎przeciwko J. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 4 grudnia 2013 r., przyjmuje skargę do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE