Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PK 238/10 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; economic layoff based on age and extra income is not discriminatory.

Numero d'incarto I PK 238/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement after his contract was terminated. The lower court found that the employer's decision to fire the youngest employee, who possessed a farm and other income, was justified by the company's economic restructuring and the ease of re-employment for younger workers. The court ruled that age and additional income are not discriminatory criteria in this context because they relate to the objective goal of minimizing reintegration difficulties during a layoff.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 30 § 4 k.p.c.; Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 113 k.p.; Art. 183a § 1 k.p.: An employer is not required to disclose specific selection criteria when terminating a contract due to economic hardship, and age or additional income are not considered discriminatory grounds if the selection aims to facilitate the employee's re-employment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
economic restructuring termination of contract discriminatory criteria reinstatement claim equal treatment layoff selection cassation appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 113 k.p.
Art. 183a § 1 k.p.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 45 k.p

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo