Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II PZ 17/07 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal by attorney for missing scope when full case is challenged under Civil Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto II PZ 17/07
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland allowed the appellant's appeal, overturning the lower court's dismissal based on a missing scope of challenge. The lower court rejected the appeal because the lawyer failed to specify the disputed amount, citing procedural defects under the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court ruled that challenging a judgment in its entirety implicitly defines the scope, rendering the specific amount requirement unnecessary when the full case is contested.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 368 § 1 pkt 1, 5 k.p.c.; Art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.: When a party challenges a judgment in its entirety, the scope of the challenge is deemed to cover the entire judgment, and the specific designation of the scope in the appeal petition is not required.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
scope of challenge appeal petition requirements attorney procedural defect full case challenge Civil Procedure Code dismissal of appeal implicit scope definition

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c.
art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 378 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 16 k.p.c.
art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 3701 k.p.c

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo