Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II PK 293/06 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court voids appeal proceedings when a co-defendant formally appeals against a judgment not addressed to them.

Numero d'incarto II PK 293/06
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court declared the appeal proceedings void because the Court of Appeal ruled against a defendant based solely on an appeal filed by a co-defendant. The lower court had issued a final judgment against one entity while ignoring the appeal lodged by another formal co-defendant regarding a different party. The court held that a co-defendant can only appeal their own judgment, making the appeal procedurally inadmissible and the subsequent ruling void.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.; Art. 379 k.p.c.; Art. 398 k.p.c.; Art. 3982 k.p.c.; Art. 386 k.p.c. - An appeal filed by a formal co-defendant against a judgment not addressed to them is inadmissible, rendering the second-instance proceedings void and the resulting judgment ineffective.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inadmissible appeal formal co-defendant void proceedings final judgment procedural defect

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 379 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
Art. 3982 k.p.c.
Art. 386 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 386 §1 k.p.c
art. 363 § 1 k.p
art. 3982 § 2 pkt 2 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
III CZP 34/91 OSNCP 1992 nr 2, poz. 24
III PK 7/04 OSNP 2005 nr 2, poz. 21
III CZP 25/67
III CZP 34/91
III PK 7/04
Supreme Court dissent argues for remand due to lack of specific party claims and unnamed joint participation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo