Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZ 3/07 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against rejection of retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence. Appeal rejected as second instance court properly handled case merits.

Numero d'incarto II UZ 3/07
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the appellate court's rejection of a retrial request. The appellant argued that a crucial employment certificate was overlooked by the second-instance court despite being newly discovered, while the court held that formal citation of the retrial ground does not guarantee its substantive existence. The decision clarified that a second-instance court ruling on the merits, even by dismissing an appeal, constitutes a judgment on the case's substance, making it the proper venue for retrial proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 405 k.p.c. A retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence is inadmissible if the circumstances do not substantively exist, and a second-instance court ruling on the merits, including dismissal of an appeal, is considered a judgment on the substance of the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
retrial proceedings newly discovered evidence second instance court substance of case appellate jurisdiction formal requirements civil procedure code

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 405 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 405 k.p.c
art. 409 k.p.c
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo