Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZ 78/05 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court quashes appeal dismissal due to improper service of documents and lack of valid power of attorney.

Numero d'incarto II UZ 78/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's decision to dismiss the applicant's request for restoring a deadline and serving judgment documents. The applicant argued that the lawyer lacked authority for the appeal stage and that service was invalid because the business address was defunct. The court ruled that the lower court erred in applying service rules to a non-residential address and failed to verify the lawyer's continued mandate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 91, 92 k.p.c.; Art. 136 § 1, 2 k.p.c.; Art. 133 ust. 3 k.p.c.; Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 387 k.p.c.: A limitation of power of attorney to a specific instance does not authorize representation in subsequent proceedings, and service of process to a business address is invalid if the business no longer exists at that location.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
power of attorney scope service of process rules business address validity deadline restoration appellate procedure

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 91 k.p.c.
Art. 92 k.p.c.
Art. 65 k.c.
Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 136 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 133 ust. 3 k.p.c.
Art. 139 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 387 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
III CZP 148/94

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo