Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZ 53/05 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court has no duty to inform appointed counsel of deadline expiry.

Numero d'incarto II UZ 53/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the appellate court's refusal to restore a missed cassation deadline. The applicant argued that the court violated procedural rules by failing to inform her appointed counsel of the deadline, while the appellate court held the delay resulted from the counsel's own negligence. The Supreme Court ruled that the law does not impose an obligation on the court to notify counsel of the deadline, and the delay was not excusable given the case's simplicity and the counsel's actions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 3934 k.p.c.; The court is not obliged to inform an appointed counsel of the expiration of the cassation deadline, and such failure cannot serve as a basis for restoring a missed deadline.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
missed cassation deadline appointed counsel duty court notification obligation procedural restoration negligence of counsel

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3934 k.p.c.
art. 3941 k.p.c.
art. 397 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 361 k.p.c
art. 3934 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo