Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZP 8/05 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed legal question as it sought specific case resolution rather than general legal interpretation.

Numero d'incarto II UZP 8/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to answer a legal question submitted by a lower court regarding reimbursement for a medical implant. The applicant had purchased an endoprosthesis out-of-pocket to bypass a long waiting list for a hip replacement procedure. The court ruled that the question was improperly framed because it required the Supreme Court to resolve the specific facts of this case rather than providing a general legal interpretation applicable to future situations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Legal questions submitted to the Supreme Court must be formulated generally and abstractly, without seeking the resolution of a specific case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legal question submission Supreme Court procedure abstract legal interpretation specific case resolution healthcare reimbursement waiting list bypass medical implant cost

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 68 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
ustawa z dnia 23.01.2003 r. o powszechnym ubezpieczeniu w Narodowym Funduszu Zdrowia
ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach opieki zdrowotnej finansowanych ze środków publicznych
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo