II UZP 8/05
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed legal question as it sought specific case resolution rather than general legal interpretation.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court of Poland refused to answer a legal question submitted by a lower court regarding reimbursement for a medical implant. The applicant had purchased an endoprosthesis out-of-pocket to bypass a long waiting list for a hip replacement procedure. The court ruled that the question was improperly framed because it required the Supreme Court to resolve the specific facts of this case rather than providing a general legal interpretation applicable to future situations.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Legal questions submitted to the Supreme Court must be formulated generally and abstractly, without seeking the resolution of a specific case.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
legal question submission
Supreme Court procedure
abstract legal interpretation
specific case resolution
healthcare reimbursement
waiting list bypass
medical implant cost
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAart. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 68 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
ustawa z dnia 23.01.2003 r. o powszechnym ubezpieczeniu w Narodowym Funduszu Zdrowia
ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach opieki zdrowotnej finansowanych ze środków publicznych
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAIII CZP 66/02
II PZP 5/04
K 14/03
Constitutional Court declares National Health Fund Act unconstitutional due to violation of subsidiarity and social dialogue principles.
III CZP 129/91
III CZP 64/02