Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II PZ 20/05 Generato dall'IA

Appeal filed during lawyer's illness is allowed if illness justified delay and remedy was timely requested.

Numero d'incarto II PZ 20/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal, which had been filed after the deadline due to the lawyer's illness. The appellant argued that the lawyer's sickness prevented timely filing, while the lower court held that the appeal was submitted too late despite the illness. The court ruled that a lawyer's illness justifying a delay cannot be used to the client's detriment if the request for time extension was made promptly after recovery.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.: If a party's failure to perform a procedural act within the time limit is not due to their fault, the court shall restore the time limit upon request; however, the act performed during the fault-causing circumstance cannot be detrimental to the party if the request for restoration was made with due diligence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural time limit restoration of time lawyer's illness due diligence standard fault in procedure appeal filing civil procedure code

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo