Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II PK 108/04 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation; employment contract term must be certain and known to parties.

Numero d'incarto II PK 108/04
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court's decision rejecting an employee's claim for damages. The employee argued that no preliminary contract existed because the agreed employment date was too vague, citing specific judicial precedents. The court held that while a calendar date is not required, the triggering event for the contract must be specific and known to both parties to ensure legal certainty.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 389 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.; The term for concluding a promised employment contract must be specific and known to the parties at least approximately.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
employment contract preliminary agreement certain term labor law cassation appeal legal certainty future event

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 389 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 26 k.p.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 389 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 4771 § 11 k.p.c
art. 217 § 2 k.p.c
art. 261 § 1 k.p.c
art. 389 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
II CRN 331/72
IV CKN 461/00
III CRN 331/72

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo