Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III PZP 17/02 Generato dall'IA

Fax delivery of termination notice is valid but violates the requirement for a handwritten signature.

Numero d'incarto III PZP 17/02
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court ruled that sending a termination notice via fax is legally effective and starts the appeal period, but it constitutes a procedural violation. The court found that while the fax successfully delivered the message, it failed to meet the statutory requirement for a handwritten signature on the document. Consequently, the termination was valid, yet the employer's method of delivery breached specific labor law provisions regarding formalities.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 30 § 3 KP; Art. 78 zd. 1 KC: Sending a termination notice via fax is effective for starting the appeal period but violates the requirement for a handwritten signature, as a fax is merely a copy of the signature.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termination notice validity fax delivery effectiveness handwritten signature requirement labor law formalities procedural violation appeal period calculation written form compliance

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 § 3 KP
Art. 78 zd. 1 KC

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
III CZP 146/93

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo