I PKN 845/00
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for failing to request time restoration within 7 days after losing excuse for delay.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and cassation regarding a dispute over employment contract termination and compensation. The plaintiffs initially sought correction of work certificates stating they abandoned their jobs, later shifting to damages claims while missing the strict 7-day deadline to request time restoration. The court ruled that filing lawsuits for damages did not constitute a request to restore the deadline, and since the legal excuses for the delay had expired, the time bar applied strictly.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 § 2 k.p.: Filing a lawsuit for damages does not constitute a request to restore the time limit for filing an appeal; once the legal excuse for the delay expires, the time limit runs strictly.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
time restoration request
statute of limitations
employment contract termination
civil procedure code
missed deadline
legal excuse expiration
damages claim
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 § 2 k.p.
Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 65 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 378 § 2 k.p.c
art. 386 § 4 k.p.c
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAI PZP 51/77
I PRN 37/78