Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 446/99 Generato dall'IA

Special work conditions proof does not require expert opinion knowledge under Polish social security law.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 446/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the applicant's right to early retirement based on special work conditions. The applicant argued that determining if work was performed under special conditions required expert testimony due to legal ambiguity, but the court found no such complexity. The court ruled that establishing the duration and continuity of work does not necessitate specialized knowledge or expert evidence under the relevant regulation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r.; Determining whether work was performed under special conditions or special character does not require specialized knowledge justifying expert opinion evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
special work conditions expert opinion evidence specialized knowledge requirement early retirement entitlement social security regulation cassation appeal dismissal work duration assessment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. w sprawie wieku emerytalnego dla pracowników zatrudnionych w szczególnych warunkach lub szczególnym charakterze
art. 278 § 1 KPC
art. 382 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
uchwała SN z dnia 27 maja 1986 r., III UZP 5/85

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo