Appeal dismissed; lawyer cannot claim client's error excuses failure to state appeal value.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Roman B. against a social insurance decision regarding pension amounts. The appellant's lawyer argued that the client misunderstood the value of the appeal subject, which the court found insufficient to justify the procedural defect. The court ruled that a lawyer cannot successfully rely on a client's error to excuse their own failure to meet formal requirements, such as stating the correct appeal value.