Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 247/98 Generato dall'IA

Cassation dismissed as inadmissible because the second-instance court failed to rule on the plaintiff's full claim without a request for supplementation.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 247/98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej K. against a partial judgment in an employment accident compensation case. The lower court altered the first-instance ruling but omitted a decision on the plaintiff's remaining claim for increased disability compensation, which neither party requested to be supplemented. The court held that since no party asked for the judgment to be completed within the statutory period, the cassation targeted a non-existent ruling and was therefore inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 351, art. 3938 KPC: If a court of the second instance fails to rule on the entirety of a party's claim without a request for supplementation, a cassation appeal against such a partial judgment is inadmissible as it targets a non-existent ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inadmissible cassation partial judgment supplementation request non-existent ruling Civil Procedure Code employment accident disability compensation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 351 KPC
art. 3938 KPC

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
C 1040/52
4 CR 1188/56
I PR 10/63
I PR 75/71
II URN 144/82
II CKN 15/97
I CZ 76/97
I CKU 51/97
III CZ 43/98
II URN 136/82
III PZP 14/72
uchwała z dnia 30 kwietnia 1966 r., III PZP 15/66

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo