Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employment law applies only to personal work under organizational subordination, not civil service contracts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding the classification of her relationship with the defendant company. Although the plaintiff argued that a series of short-term contracts constituted a continuous employment relationship under Article 25 § 1 of the Labor Code, the court found the facts established civil service contracts for service provision. The court ruled that the essential elements of an employment relationship, specifically personal performance of work and organizational subordination, were absent because the plaintiff could delegate tasks and was not under direct supervision. Consequently, the court held that the statutory presumption of employment does not apply when the underlying legal relationship is a civil service contract, even if the parties intended an employment status.