Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 77/96 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation for lack of grounds, upholding lower court's free evaluation of evidence in disability pension case.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 77/96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Grzegorz W. against the Second Instance Court's decision denying his claim for a rural disability pension. The appellant argued that the lower court improperly excluded an additional expert opinion from the Collegium Medicum, violating procedural rules regarding evidence evaluation. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lower court correctly exercised its freedom of evidence assessment based on the existing medical records and expert opinions which consistently found the applicant capable of light farm work without constant care.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The cassation court cannot review the substantive correctness of factual findings made by the lower court, as the lower court retains the freedom of evidence assessment unless a clear violation of procedural rules occurs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
freedom of evidence assessment disability pension classification cassation admissibility medical expert opinions rural disability pension procedural review limits invalidity group I

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 393 § 15 KPC
Art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 24 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo