Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 24/96 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal for failure to state grounds and justify legal violations under Civil Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 24/96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the applicant failed to specify the grounds for cassation and justify the alleged procedural violations. The applicant challenged a lower court's refusal to grant early retirement based on insufficient work history, arguing factual errors regarding employment at a farm. The court ruled that without specific grounds and a detailed explanation of the legal breach, the appeal cannot be substantively examined and must be rejected as inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 393 § 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal must clearly state its grounds and justify the alleged violation of law or procedure; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible and precludes substantive review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal inadmissible grounds Civil Procedure Code procedural violation justification requirement substantive review dismissal of appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 8 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 11 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
C.III 31/37

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo