Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PZP 20/96 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rules union officer gets full severance pay even if union consent existed for dismissal.

Numero d'incarto I PZP 20/96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a union officer entitled to special job security must receive full severance pay upon reinstatement. The plaintiff argued that employer consent from the union's management committee for dismissal should negate her protected status under labor law. The court rejected this, holding that such consent does not remove the employee from special protection or exempt the employer from full compensation upon wrongful reinstatement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 57 § 2 Kodeksu pracy: Obtaining union management consent for dismissal does not remove a union officer from special job security protection; the employer remains liable for full severance pay upon wrongful reinstatement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
special job security protection union officer status union management consent full severance pay wrongful dismissal reinstatement

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 57 § 2 Kodeksu pracy

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo