I PRN 5/95 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal despite wrong document title if it contains appeal grounds and request for change.

Numero d'incarto I PRN 5/95

Autorità giudiziaria Sąd Najwyższy

Giurisdizione

Polonia (PL)

Data della decisione 1995-04-04

Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted extraordinary review to overturn a lower court's dismissal of an appeal due to a procedural error. The plaintiff submitted a document titled 'appeal' to the second instance court, which the lower court mistakenly treated as a request for the judgment's reasoning, thereby delaying the appeal deadline. The Supreme Court ruled that such clerical errors do not invalidate the appeal if the document clearly identifies the challenged judgment, states the grounds, and requests a change, allowing the appeal to proceed as if filed on time.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 371 § 2 k.p.c.: Clerical errors or incorrect document titles do not prevent the commencement of proceedings if the document contains the challenged judgment, grounds for appeal, and a request for its change.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

procedural error incorrect document title appeal commencement extraordinary review clerical mistake judicial discretion statutory interpretation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 370 k.p.c.

Art. 371 § 2 k.p.c.

Art. 367 k.p.c.

Art. 328 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 370 k.p.c

art. 371 § 2 k.p.c

art. 367 k.p.c

art. 371 § 1 k.p.c

Supreme Court allows appeal despite wrong document title if it contains appeal grounds and request for change.

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo