Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
69-12563 Generato dall'IA

Removal Premium Quashed Due to Significant Decrease in Habitable Area

Numero d'incarto 69-12563
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Francia (FR)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court quashed a decision granting a removal premium because the relocation involved a significant decrease in habitable surface area (from $102.75 \text{ m}^2$ to $69.79 \text{ m}^2$), which should preclude the award unless the new premises offer an appreciable improvement in living conditions, particularly concerning the ratio of occupants to surface area. The lower body erred in finding an improvement based on the temporary departure of two children to study, which reduced the current household size, because the applicable regulation requires considering the potential occupancy, meaning the reduction in size constituted a deterioration of occupancy conditions, thus lacking a legal basis for granting the premium.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

ARTICLE 542 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE, ARTICLE 18, DU DECRET N° 61-687 DU 30 JUIN 1961; Removal Premium Quashed Due to Significant Decrease in Habitable Area: The lower body erred in finding an improvement based on the temporary departure of two children to study, which reduced the current household size, because the applicable regulation requires considering the potential occupancy, meaning the reduction in size constituted a deterioration of occupancy conditions, thus lacking a legal basis for granting the premium.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riduzione dei contributi riduzione del canone locativo distrazione di valori patrimoniali allontanamento legge sugli alloggi revoca del permesso di domicilio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
ARTICLE 542 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE
This article, combined with Art. 18 of the Decree of June 30, 1961, defines the conditions for granting moving premiums, which was the central issue justifying the cassation.
ARTICLE 18, DU DECRET N° 61-687 DU 30 JUIN 1961
This article, combined with Art. 542 of the Social Security Code, defines the conditions for granting moving premiums, which was the central issue justifying the cassation.
Generato dall'IA
68-13717
Moving Premium Denied for Reduced Housing Space
JURITEXT000006974247
Relocation Bonus Denial Upheld Despite Reduced Living Space
17-21677
Tenant Eviction Based on Miscalculated Habitable Volume
17-26919
Expropriation Compensation and Rehousing Rights of Property Occupants
90-11261
Tenant Surface Area Calculation Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
ARTICLE 542 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE

This article, combined with Art. 18 of the Decree of June 30, 1961, defines the conditions for granting moving premiums, which was the central issue justifying the cassation.

ARTICLE 18, DU DECRET N° 61-687 DU 30 JUIN 1961

This article, combined with Art. 542 of the Social Security Code, defines the conditions for granting moving premiums, which was the central issue justifying the cassation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU L'ARTICLE 542 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE, ENSEMBLE L'ARTICLE 18, DU DECRET N° 61-687 DU 30 JUIN 1961 ;

ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE CES TEXTES QUE LES PRIMES DE DEMENAGEMENT NE SONT ALLOUEES QUE SI LE NOUVEAU LOCAL PRESENTE UNE AMELIORATION APPRECIABLE DES CONDITIONS DE LOGEMENT, NOTAMMENT QUANT AU NOMBRE D'OCCUPANTS RAPPORTE A LA SURFACE HABITABLE ;

ATTENDU QUE POUR ADMETTRE QUE X..., QUI AVAIT QUITTE SON LOGEMENT DE SAINT-VICTORET, SOIT UNE MAISON INDIVIDUELLE COMPORTANT CINQ PIECES PRINCIPALES HABITABLES ET UNE PIECE SECONDAIRE, D'UNE SUPERFICIE TOTALE DE 102,75 M2 POUR OCCUPER A MARSEILLE UN APPARTEMENT DE CINQ PIECES PRINCIPALES D'UNE SUPERFICIE TOTALE DE 69,79 M2, AVAIT LE DROIT DE PERCEVOIR LA PRIME DE DEMENAGEMENT, LA DECISION ATTAQUEE RELEVE QUE, NONOBSTANT LA PERTE DE 32,96 M2, DE SURFACE HABITABLE, LA FAMILLE SE TROUVAIT, PAR LE FAIT DU DEPART A GRENOBLE, PENDANT LE CYCLE DE LEURS ETUDES, DE DEUX DES TROIS ENFANTS, REDUITE AUX EPOUX X..., ET A UN SEUL ENFANT, POUR UN LOCAL COMPORTANT TROIS CHAMBRES, ET QU'AINSI L'HABITAT LITIGIEUX DOIT ETRE CONSIDERE COMME REPONDANT AUX NORMES IMPERATIVES DE LA LOI, ET, PAR VOIE DE CONSEQUENCE, TENU POUR AMELIORE A RAISON DES REGLES D'URBANISME ET VIABILISATION (SIC) OBSERVEES ;

QU'EN STATUANT AINSI, ALORS QU'IL RESULTAIT DE SES PROPRES CONSTATATIONS QUE LE SEJOUR DES ENFANTS A GRENOBLE N'ETAIT QUE TEMPORAIRE ET QUE, PAR SUITE, COMPTE TENU DU NOMBRE D'OCCUPANTS RAPPORTE A LA SURFACE HABITABLE IL Y AVAIT, NON POINT AMELIORATION APPRECIABLE, MAIS DETERIORATION DES CONDITIONS DE PEUPLEMENT, LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE N'A PAS DONNE UNE BASE LEGALE A SA DECISION ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE LA DECISION RENDUE ENTRE LES PARTIES, PAR LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DES BOUCHES-DU-RHONE, LE 12 MAI 1969 ;

REMET, EN CONSEQUENCE, LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LADITE DECISION ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DU VAR