Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
TT:2014-176 Generato dall'IA

Labour court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract due to redundancy.

Numero d'incarto TT:2014-176
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Labour Court dismissed the Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM ry's appeal against the termination of an employee's contract by Kaupan liitto ry. The court found that the employer had a legitimate need for redundancy and followed proper procedures, while the employee's arguments regarding unfair treatment were rejected. Consequently, the termination was upheld as lawful under Finnish labour law principles regarding redundancy.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Työlaki 1091/1991; Työsuhdelaki 551/2001: An employer's decision to terminate a contract due to redundancy is lawful if the need is genuine and the procedure complies with statutory requirements, overriding union appeals based on procedural irregularities absent in the record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
redundancy termination labour court appeal union representation employment contract Finnish labour law salario minimo violazione di obbligazioni contrattuali di lavoro perdita di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Työlaki 1091/1991
Työsuhdelaki 551/2001
Generato dall'IA
labour_1995_54
Court dismisses dismissal claims where employer failed to offer work to laid-off workers in a related company.
labour_1983_40
Labor court orders damages for unfair dismissal of a union representative and fines the employer union for negligence.
labour_1990_113
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated collective agreement by firing workers without following reduction procedures.
labour_2006_25
Dismissed: Termination of senior employee without valid cause after warning violated no-cause clause.
labour_1989_126
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated collective agreement dismissal rules by firing three workers.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM ry

VASTAAJA

Kaupan liitto ry

KUULTAVA

Vaasan Mini-Mani Oy