Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 674/2020 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding employment relationship and salary rights after business transfer.

Numero d'incarto KKO 674/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Administrative Court's decision confirming an unjustified dismissal. The employee had been transferred to a new company following a business transfer, and the lower court found no valid reason for the termination. The court upheld the finding that the employment relationship existed from the transfer date and the employee was entitled to back pay.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Työsuhdelaki 1091/1991; Työehtosopimuslaki 42/2010: When an employer transfers a business to a new entity, the employment relationship continues with the new employer, and the employee retains the right to remuneration for the period following the transfer.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
employment relationship continuity business transfer unjustified dismissal back pay entitlement labor law principles trasporti internazionali su strada responsabilità del vettore azienda ausiliare nell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Työsuhdelaki 1091/1991
Työehtosopimuslaki 42/2010
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:35
Supreme Court dismisses claim that employment relationship existed after municipal transfer due to employer's failure to hire.
kko-other_1997_1490
Supreme Court dismisses claim that business transfer occurred under Labor Code 7 § 2 due to employer insolvency and partial asset transfer.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:57
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses claim that public service relationship continued after business transfer to private company.
kko-precedent_1996_10
Supreme Court dismisses employee claim that business transfer during bankruptcy invalidates prior termination.
labour_1992_8
Union wins damages for unfair dismissal linked to strike; employer union fined for failing to supervise.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kunnallisen liikelaitoksen X palveluksessa virkasuhteessa ollut A oli irtisanottu ja irtisanomisaika oli päättynyt. Liikelaitoksen henkilöstö oli sittemmin 1.1.2014 tapahtuneen liikkeen luovutuksen myötä siirtynyt perustetun X Oy:n palvelukseen. Korkein hallinto-oikeus oli noin kolme vuotta myöhemmin antamallaan päätöksellä pysyttänyt hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisun, jonka mukaan irtisanominen oli ollut perusteeton. Kysymys sen arvioimisesta, oliko A:n ja X Oy:n välille syntynyt työsuhde 1.1.2014 alkaen ja oliko A:lla oikeus saada yhtiöltä palkkaa sanotusta ajankohdasta lukien.