Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1471/2020 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows transfer to Sweden but rejects condition of returning to Finland for sentence execution.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1471/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's order to transfer the applicant to Sweden for criminal proceedings while rejecting the request to condition the transfer on returning to Finland to serve a potential prison sentence. The applicant argued that returning to Finland was necessary to execute any future sentence, but the court found no legal basis to impose such a condition on the transfer itself. Consequently, the applicant may be transferred to Sweden without the prerequisite of returning to Finland, though they will still be subject to Finnish jurisdiction for the original crime.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 1000 b. 1 l. 1 v. 1998; s. 1000 b. 1 l. 2 v. 1998: The Supreme Court held that a condition requiring the transfer of a person to another state to return to Finland for the execution of a potential prison sentence is not legally permissible under the relevant extradition and judicial cooperation statutes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
extradition conditions prison sentence execution judicial cooperation transfer of persons criminal proceedings Supreme Court ruling conditional transfer principio di non respingimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 1000 b. 1 l. 1 v. 1998
s. 1000 b. 1 l. 2 v. 1998
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1997_149
Supreme Court allows prosecution for pre-extradition crimes when extradition is for sentence execution under Nordic law.
kko-other_2025_976
Supreme Court dismisses extradition request when Finnish citizen voluntarily waives domestic criminal proceedings.
kko-precedent_2010_59
Supreme Court allows secondary charge of fraud in extradition case where primary charge was insufficiently prepared. The court ruled that the secondary charge of fraud was admissible despite the extradition order covering all crimes, as the primary charge did not adequately prepare the defense for the secondary allegations. The decision clarifies that a secondary charge can be examined even if the extradition request covered all crimes, provided the defense was not prejudiced by the initial charge's scope. The court held that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes.
kko-other_2016_769
Supreme Court allows surrender refusal based on EU law discretionary grounds regarding child's best interests.
kko-precedent_1991_155
Supreme Court reduced state compensation for wrongful detention in Finland prior to extradition to Norway.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli määrännyt A:n luovutettavaksi Ruotsiin syytetoimenpiteitä varten. Kysymys käräjäoikeuden antaman muutoksenhakuohjauksen oikeellisuudesta ja siitä, oliko luovuttamisen ehdoksi asetettava luovutettavan palauttaminen Suomeen suorittamaan mahdollisesti tuomittua vapausrangaistusta.