Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 777/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding evidence sufficiency for organized crime and drug facilitation charges based on prison records.

Numero d'incarto KKO 777/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's conviction of the defendant for participating in an organized crime group and facilitating drug offenses. The lower court found the defendant guilty based on his role as a lookout on a motorcycle gang's premises and his membership fees, despite his claim of innocence. The court upheld the conviction because the evidence, including the defendant's time in prison and the financial records, sufficiently proved the criminal acts without requiring further clarification.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Organized Crime Act; Drug Offences Act: The court may convict a defendant based on circumstantial evidence linking membership in a criminal group and financial contributions to its activities, provided the evidence chain is coherent and excludes reasonable doubt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
organized crime participation drug offense facilitation circumstantial evidence sufficiency criminal group membership financial contribution proof reasonable doubt standard prison record evidence diritti inerenti alla qualità di membro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Organized Crime Act
Drug Offences Act
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:37
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; insufficient evidence that drug crime was part of organized group activity.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:89
Supreme Court upheld aggravated sentencing for organized group thefts under Finnish Criminal Code provisions.
kko-precedent_1995_156
Supreme Court dismisses robbery charge against accomplice who provided tools but did not plan or execute the crime.
kko-other_2006_1272
Supreme Court allows partial sentence reduction for theft and hiding when defendant shows remorse and cooperation.
kko-other_1999_55
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditional sentence for serious fraud and other crimes.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hovioikeus oli lukenut A:n syyksi järjestäytyneen rikollisryhmän toimintaan osallistumisen sillä perusteella, että A oli toiminut erään rikollisryhmäksi katsotun moottoripyöräkerhon hallitsemalla kiinteistöllä niin sanottuna väijymiehenä ja näin edistänyt ryhmän rikollisten tavoitteiden saavuttamista. Lisäksi hovioikeus oli lukenut A:n syyksi huumausainerikoksen edistämisen sillä perusteella, että A oli ollut kerhon jäsen ja maksanut sille kuukausittain jäsenmaksua näin osallistuen rikollisryhmän huumausainerikostoiminnan rahoittamiseen.

A oli ollut mainittujen syytteiden mukaisten rikosten tekoajasta kahdeksaa päivää kattavaa ajanjaksoa lukuun ottamatta vapautensa menettäneenä vankilassa. A kiisti myös maksaneensa kyseisenä ajankohtana kerhon jäsenmaksua. Kysymys näytön arvioinnista.