Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 239/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows union member to sue individually for transferred union dues despite individual payment orders.

Numero d'incarto KKO 239/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland overturned the Court of Appeal's dismissal of a union member's lawsuit seeking recovery of union dues transferred to the union. The union member argued that, as a recipient of transferred dues, they possessed the right to sue individually for their share, even though specific payment orders existed for each employee. The court ruled that the statutory basis for the transfer of dues grants the recipient the standing to initiate such a claim in their own name.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Trade Union Act 1987; Section 10 of the Trade Union Act 1987: A recipient of transferred union dues has the right to sue individually for the recovery of the transferred amount, notwithstanding individual payment orders issued to the employees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
union dues transfer standing to sue individual payment order trade union law recovery of funds supreme court ruling procedural standing salari e spostamento della manodopera

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Trade Union Act 1987
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:8
Supreme Court allows union to sue in own name for transferred wage claims despite direct payment order.
labour_2018_27
Labor court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee for gross misconduct.
labour_2002_89
Union union fined for strike over job transfer violating collective agreement management rights.
labour_2016_63
Union appeal dismissed; employer and shipowner not liable for union's strike action damages.
labour_2018_52
Labor court allows union claim against shipowner for dismissing trustee without majority consent and orders compensation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Työntekijäliitto vaati kanteessaan, että työnantaja velvoitetaan suorittamaan työntekijöille näiden liitolle perittäväksi siirtämät työpalkkasaamiset. Hovioikeus katsoi, ettei liitolla ollut oikeutta omissa nimissään ajaa kannetta ja jätti kanteen tutkimatta. Korkein oikeus kumoten hovioikeuden päätöksen katsoi, että siirronsaajalla on perimissiirron perusteella oikeus omissa nimissään ajaa tällaista kannetta saatavan perimiseksi huolimatta siitä, että suorituksia oli vaadittu maksettavaksi kullekin työntekijälle.