Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 1578/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of construction defect claim due to procedural error in lower court.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1578/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted a leave to appeal against the High Court's dismissal of a buyer's claim for price reduction and damages regarding construction defects. The lower court rejected the claim because buyers failed to demonstrate they offered the seller a chance to inspect alleged errors and notified their demands within a reasonable time. The Supreme Court determined the High Court erred in applying the procedural requirements and should have granted the leave to appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Construction Act; Sale of Goods Act: Where a buyer fails to offer the seller an opportunity to inspect alleged defects and notify demands within a reasonable time, the court must assess whether this procedural failure warrants dismissal; however, if the lower court incorrectly applies these requirements, the Supreme Court may grant a leave to appeal to correct the procedural error.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
construction defects price reduction claim reasonable time notice inspection opportunity leave to appeal procedural dismissal buyer obligations vizio di costruzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Construction Act
Sale of Goods Act
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kiinteistön ostajat olivat vaatineet myyjältä hinnanalennusta ja vahingonkorvausta laatuvirheiden perusteella. Käräjäoikeus oli hylännyt kanteen, koska ostajat eivät olleet näyttäneet, että he olisivat varanneet myyjälle tilaisuuden tutustua väitettyihin virheisiin ja että he olisivat ilmoittaneet vaatimustensa määrästä kohtuullisena pidettävässä ajassa. Hovioikeus ei myöntänyt ostajille jatkokäsittelylupaa. Korkeimman oikeuden päätöksestä ilmenevillä perusteilla katsottiin, että hovioikeuden olisi tullut myöntää jatkokäsittelylupa muutosperusteella.