Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 655/2017 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses drunk driving charge where only non-impaired cannabis metabolite was detected in blood.

Numero d'incarto KKO 655/2017
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the defendant's drunk driving charge because only a cannabis metabolite without impairing effects was found in their blood. The prosecution argued for a conviction based on the presence of the substance, while the defense contended that the specific metabolite, carboxy-THC, does not affect driving ability. The court ruled that since the statutory requirements for impaired driving were not met due to the lack of actual impairment, the charge could not stand.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Rikoslaki 39/1988; Rikostilanne 10/1994: A charge of drunk driving is not established if the only detected substance is a metabolite that does not impair driving ability.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
drunk driving charge cannabis metabolite driving impairment carboxy-THC Supreme Court Finland criminal liability statutory requirements sostanze di origine umana

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Rikoslaki 39/1988
Rikostilanne 10/1994
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2009_73
Supreme Court allows separate drug use charge when driving under influence, rejecting prior case precedent.
kko-precedent_2016_42
Supreme Court allows conviction for drug driving when metabolites are present but do not impair driving ability.
kko-other_1996_1549
Supreme Court held that driving while intoxicated by alcohol and another drug proves knowledge of the latter's effects.
kko-precedent_2000_5
Supreme Court orders retrial in robbery case where defendant contests threat evidence credibility without hearing witnesses.
market_2019_526
Market Court quashes decision for retrial but dismisses claim for reimbursement of legal costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kuljettajan veressä oli ajon jälkeen ollut vain sellaista kannabiksen vaikuttavan aineen aineenvaihduntatuotetta (karboksitetrahydrokannabinolia), jolla ei ole vaikutusta ajokykyyn. Rattijuopumuksen tunnusmerkistö ei täyttynyt.