Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1004/2017 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages for back injury from boat ride due to lack of jurisdiction over the matter.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1004/2017
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages regarding a back injury sustained during a boat ride organized by the defendant company. The plaintiff argued the driver exceeded speed limits in rough waters, while the defendant claimed the plaintiff accepted inherent risks and the company acted responsibly. The court ruled that the matter fell outside the court's substantive jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 1004/2017; The Supreme Court held that a claim for damages arising from a recreational boat ride falls outside the substantive jurisdiction of the court when the dispute concerns the organization of the event rather than a specific tortious act within the court's mandate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
substantive jurisdiction recreational boat ride damages claim risk acceptance Korkein oikeus tort liability organizational dispute compensazione dei rischi

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:2017:24
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court lacks jurisdiction over recreational boat trip claims under maritime law.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2017_24
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court lacks jurisdiction over recreational boat trip claims under maritime law.
kko-precedent_2010_85
Supreme Court dismisses fraud charges but upholds embezzlement conviction for corporate asset misappropriation.
kko-precedent_1999_36
Supreme Court dismisses theft charge as prior fraud charge was final and covered same act.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling that the defendant committed gross extortion by exploiting a dependent position to obtain disproportionate financial gain.
kko-precedent_1988_137
Shareholder bound by knowledge of defects cannot claim contract termination for company.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli osallistunut X Oy:n järjestämään tilaisuuteen, jonka ohjelmaan oli sisältynyt veneajelu yhtiön omistamalla niin sanotulla RIB-veneellä. A vaati käräjäoikeudessa X Oy:ltä veneajelun järjestäjänä vahingonkorvausta sillä perusteella, että hän oli loukannut selkänsä veneajelussa sen seurauksena, että veneen kuljettaja oli ajanut liian suurella tilannenopeudella ristiaallokkoon ottamatta huomioon vallinneita meriolosuhteita. X Oy vaati kanteen hylkäämistä lausuen muun ohella, että A oli ollut tietoinen veneajelun luonteesta ja hyväksynyt siihen liittyneen riskin eikä yhtiö ollut menetellyt tuottamuksellisesti. Kysymys tuomioistuimen asiallisesta toimivallasta. Ks. KKO:2017:24