Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from an illegal competition restriction. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's conduct violated competition laws, but the court found the claim time-barred under the general statute of limitations. Consequently, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid cause of action due to the expiration of the limitation period.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998); VanhL 7 § 1 mom, 7 § 2 mom: A claim for damages based on an illegal competition restriction is barred if the general statute of limitations has expired.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys kielletystä kilpailunrajoituksesta aiheutuneen vahingon korvaamista koskevan vaatimuksen vanhentumisesta. Ks. KKO:2016:11
L kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998)
VanhL 7 § 1 mom
VanhL 7 § 2 mom