Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1683/2016 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal due to missing objection filing record.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1683/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the District Court's decision to dismiss the prosecution's complaint. The prosecution had timely filed an objection to the District Court's judgment, but the District Court failed to record this objection in its file, causing the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeal without examination. The Supreme Court ruled that the procedural defect necessitated remanding the case for proper handling of the objection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Section 34 of the Criminal Procedure Act: When a lower court fails to record a timely objection to its judgment, the appellate court must not dismiss the appeal without examination and the case must be remanded for correction of the procedural defect.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure objection to judgment procedural defect appellate review remand for correction record keeping timely objection errore giudiziario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Section 34 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:5
Supreme Court allows appeal review of late dissatisfaction notice approval as procedural issue, not final judgment.
kko-precedent_2009_38
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; judge not liable for jurisdictional error due to ambiguous coercive procedure rules.
kko-precedent_2011_30
Supreme Court remands appeal to High Court for retrial due to procedural error excluding defendant despite lawyer's presence.
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
kko-other_2012_823
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where court president lacked authority to preside over the case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asianomistaja oli ilmoittanut määräajassa tyytymättömyyttä käräjäoikeuden tuomioon. Käräjäoikeuden tuomiosta oli käräjäoikeudessa tapahtuneen virheen johdosta puuttunut merkintä tyytymättömyyden ilmoituksesta, minkä vuoksi hovioikeus oli jättänyt asianomistajan valituksen tutkimatta. Kysymys valituksen tutkimisesta.