Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 822/2015 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when creditor's claim is filed after assets are paid to creditors.

Numero d'incarto KKO 822/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the procedural validity of a creditor's claim filed after assets were paid to creditors. The lower court had not examined the creditor's claim because the disputed assets had already been transferred to the creditors. The court ruled that the procedural defect was cured by the actual payment, rendering the subsequent filing irrelevant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ulosoton laki 1997; Ulosmittauslaki 1997: When assets subject to a creditor's claim are paid to creditors before the claim is formally filed, the procedural defect of non-examination is cured, and the claim is deemed valid.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
creditor's claim asset payment procedural validity supreme court enforcement law vizio di procedura vizio del consenso clausola d'esenzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Ulosoton laki 1997
Ulosmittauslaki 1997
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2014_28
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where seized funds were paid to creditors before appeal, limiting access to court without violating fair trial rights.
kko-precedent_2004_66
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when third party bypasses lower court appeal in enforcement action. Third party must follow statutory appeal order to challenge enforcement. Court rejects exception allowing late appeal based on enforcement law provisions.
kko-other_2007_533
Supreme Court dismisses enforcement claim where final bank account balance is insufficient to satisfy the debt.
kko-other_1997_1608
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court rejected incomplete complaint without notice due to respondent's possession of full document.
kko-other_2026_335
Supreme Court remands sale auction case for failure to notify buyer of appeal hearing opportunity.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta, kun ulosottovalitus oli jätetty hovioikeudessa tutkimatta sen jälkeen, kun ulosmitatut varat oli tilitetty velkojille.