Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 238/2015 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against High Court's removal of sentence execution without prosecutor request.

Numero d'incarto KKO 238/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the High Court erred by removing the execution of a residual sentence on its own initiative without hearing the parties. The prosecutor had not requested this execution, and the lower court failed to justify its removal or explain why the sentence should be reduced. The court held that such procedural steps require explicit justification and party participation to ensure fairness.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

RL 2 c luku 14 §; The High Court cannot unilaterally remove the execution of a residual sentence or reduce a combined sentence without the prosecutor's request and without providing reasoned justification or hearing the parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
residual sentence execution High Court procedure prosecutor request requirement combined sentence reduction procedural fairness violation unilateral judicial action reasoned justification standard sospensione dell'assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
RL 2 c luku 14 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2023_16
Supreme Court allows retrial when prosecution fails to file charges within one year after probation ends.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
kko-precedent_2014_5
Supreme Court allows residual sentence execution and sets combined prison term at ten years for murder.
kko-precedent_1997_13
Supreme Court allows joint prison sentence in appeal court under Criminal Code joint punishment rules.
appeal_1984_kouvola__1742
Court of Appeal voids execution of conditional sentence due to lack of finality in original order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli tuomiolauselmalla määrännyt jäännösrangaistuksen täytäntöönpantavaksi ja tuominnut siitä ja syyksilukemastaan rikoksesta yhteisen rangaistuksen. Käräjäoikeuden tuomiosta tai pöytäkirjasta ei ilmennyt, että syyttäjä olisi tällaista vaatinut eikä käräjäoikeus ollut perustellut jäännösrangaistuksen täytäntöönpanoa. Hovioikeuden katsottiin menetelleen virheellisesti, kun se oli omasta aloitteestaan ja asianosaisia kuulematta poistanut jäännösrangaistuksen täytäntöönpanoa koskevan lausunnon ja alentanut rangaistusta sillä perusteella, että syyttäjä ei ollut käräjäoikeudessa vaatinut jäännösrangaistuksen täytäntöönpanoa.

Kysymys lisäksi kokonaan täytäntöönpannun jäännösrangaistuksen vaikutuksesta yhteiseen vankeusrangaistukseen.

RL 2 c luku 14 §