Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 277/2014 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court remands insurance claim for chronic cheek infection as professional disease due to insufficient factual findings.

Numero d'incarto KKO 277/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland remanded the case to the insurance authority for re-evaluation. The applicant sought compensation for a chronic cheek infection classified as a professional disease, but the original decision lacked specific factual findings and legal reasoning supporting this classification. The court ruled that without these essential elements, the decision could not stand and must be reconsidered by the lower authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Act; Liability Act: When an insurance authority's decision fails to provide specific factual findings and legal reasoning regarding the classification of a condition as a professional disease, the decision is remanded for re-evaluation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
professional disease classification insurance liability claim chronic cheek infection insufficient factual findings remand for re-evaluation Supreme Court of Finland insurance authority decision affezione anteriore al servizio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Insurance Act
Liability Act
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:43
Supreme Court dismisses occupational disease claim for asthma caused by mold exposure due to insufficient causal evidence.
kko-other_1995_149
Supreme Court held that strong evidence of occupational asbestos exposure requires insurer to prove non-work-related cause to deny claim.
insurance_2013_5216-2011
Insurance court allows occupational disease claim for chronic heat exhaustion based on medical evidence of workplace exposure.
kko-other_2002_16
Supreme Court dismisses claim for occupational disease compensation for asthma caused by mold exposure in wood treatment work.
insurance_2019_1206-2018
Insurance court dismisses appeal against administrative board decision for lack of reviewable substantive ruling.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Koska vakuutusoikeuden päätöksestä ei ilmennyt niitä tosiseikkoja ja sitä oikeudellista päättelyä, jolla kroonisen poskiontelotulehduksen korvaamiseen ammattitautina oli päädytty, asia palautettiin vakuutusoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.