Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1933/2014 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows prosecution for tax fraud where tax adjustment preceded the formal charge.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1933/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the prosecution of three individuals for serious tax fraud based on a prior tax adjustment order. While the defendant argued that the tax adjustment constituted a final penalty preventing further criminal proceedings, the court distinguished between the administrative measure and the criminal charge. The court ruled that the existence of a tax adjustment does not bar criminal prosecution, as the two proceedings serve different legal purposes and the adjustment was not a final penalty in the criminal sense.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Verotuslaki 1994/1065, 10 luku; Verosääntelylaki 1994/1065, 10 luku: The issuance of a tax adjustment order prior to criminal charges does not preclude the initiation of criminal proceedings for tax fraud, as the administrative measure and criminal prosecution serve distinct legal functions and the adjustment is not a final penalty.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tax fraud prosecution tax adjustment order double jeopardy principle criminal liability administrative penalty procedural bar serious tax offense appropriazione indebita di fondi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
10 luku Verotuslaki 1994/1065
10 luku Verosääntelylaki 1994/1065
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2014_889
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax adjustments in income tax assessment being admissible in criminal trial.
kko-precedent_2011_80
Double jeopardy bars VAT fraud prosecution when facts overlap with income tax fraud already finalized by tax authority.
kko-other_2014_1893
Supreme Court allows tax fraud prosecution when unreported income is discovered during tax audit.
kko-other_2014_376
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax penalty decisions blocking criminal tax fraud trial.
kko-other_2014_1513
Supreme Court allows partial prosecution for tax fraud where tax penalties were imposed before criminal charges were filed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A:lle, B:lle ja C:lle oli määrätty henkilökohtaisessa verotuksessa veronkorotusta sillä perusteella, että he olivat jättäneet ilmoittamatta saamaansa tuloa. Sittemmin heitä syytettiin muun ohella saman menettelyn perusteella törkeistä veropetoksista. A:n osalta veronkorotusta oli määrätty ennen kuin häntä koskeva syyte oli tullut vireille. B:n ja C:n osalta veronkorotusta oli määrätty vasta syytteen vireilletulon jälkeen. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko syytteet tutkia.