Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 184/2012 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court quashed lower court's boundary ruling where only part of the boundary was surveyed.

Numero d'incarto KKO 184/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland quashed the Land Court's decision confirming a boundary line that had only been surveyed partially. While the lower court ruled the entire boundary established, the Supreme Court found the survey incomplete regarding the specific path between the two properties. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new survey and determination of the full boundary line.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Boundary Act; Land Survey Act: When a boundary survey is conducted only for a portion of the path between two properties, the lower court's confirmation of the entire boundary line is invalid and must be quashed for remand.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
boundary survey partial survey boundary line Land Court remand for new survey rimozione di termini divieto di accedere a un dato territorio disposizioni transitorie in materia marittima

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Boundary Act
Land Survey Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2011_45
Supreme Court remands case for retrial due to insufficient assessment of significant harm to neighbor's property from road relocation.
kko-precedent_2013_22
Supreme Court allows boundary survey retrial where error was correctable and parties consented despite unclear grounds.
kko-precedent_2016_72
Supreme Court applies Administrative Procedure Act to surveyor's impartiality in land division proceedings.
kko-precedent_1991_69
Supreme Court quashes survey dismissal for failing to conduct boundary survey during formal proceeding after prior boundary setting.
kko-precedent_1998_100
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on grounds that prior case handling did not create judicial bias. The court held the members were not disqualified because the earlier case was not the same matter. The decision upholds the lower court's ruling on the boundary dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Maantietoimituksen yhteydessä suoritetussa rajankäynnissä kahden tilan välinen raja oli käyty vain tiealueen osalta. Maaoikeus kuitenkin vahvisti kyseisen välirajan käydyksi koko matkaltaan. Maaoikeuden ratkaisu ja toimitus rajankäynnin osalta kumottiin ja asia palautettiin tilojen välirajaa koskevalta osalta toimituksessa uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.