Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2728/2011 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding insurance fraud charges based on lack of evidence for forgery and serious fraud.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2728/2011
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against the conviction for forgery and serious fraud. The defendant was found guilty after signing his wife's signature onto an insurance policy and related medical report without authorization. The court upheld the conviction because the prosecution successfully proved the defendant knowingly altered the document to secure insurance benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikosrikoksista 39/88; Rikoslaki 39/1988: The court established that knowingly signing another person's name on a document with the intent to deceive constitutes forgery and serious fraud when the deception results in significant financial gain.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
forgery serious fraud insurance policy unauthorized signature criminal conviction Supreme Court financial gain frode nelle giustificazioni del contratto di assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki rikosrikoksista 39/88
Rikoslaki 39/1988
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2006_73
Doctor convicted of fraud for signing false medical reports to defraud insurance company of patient payments.
kko-precedent_1989_70
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; insurer's assets cannot justify reduced subrogation recovery under damage compensation law.
kko-precedent_1994_70
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; self-harm exclusion clause not unreasonable despite short lapse period.
kko-precedent_1997_103
Supreme Court allows insurer to reduce auditor's claim due to gross negligence in failing to warn about illegal share buybacks.
kko-precedent_1987_66
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; driver loses claim against insurer and must pay litigation costs per Traffic Insurance Act.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vastaaja oli kirjoittanut puolisonsa allekirjoituksen henkilövakuutuksen vakuutusehdotukseen sekä siihen liittyvään terveysselvitykseen. Kysymys siitä, oliko vastaaja syyllistynyt väärennykseen ja törkeään petokseen.