Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2790/2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against lawyer appointment order but rejects request to replace counsel.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2790/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court permitted an appeal against a lower court's revocation of a lawyer's appointment but rejected the request to substitute the new counsel. The parties argued that the original appointment was flawed and that the new lawyer should be replaced after settlement negotiations concluded. The court ruled that while the procedural error regarding the initial appointment warranted reversal, the substantive request to appoint a different lawyer lacked sufficient legal basis.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki oikeudenkäyntikustannuksista (1993) 10. luku; Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1993) 10. luku: The court may revoke a lawyer's appointment due to procedural defects, but a subsequent request to appoint a different lawyer requires independent grounds and cannot be granted merely because the original appointment was revoked.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lawyer appointment legal aid substitution of counsel procedural defect civil procedure law modifica di misure cautelari sostituzione fedecommissaria revisione di una decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
10. luku Laki oikeudenkäyntikustannuksista (1993)
10. luku Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1993)
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1986_rovaniemi__1037
Court dismisses lawyer's fee waiver due to employment change and appoints new lawyer.
kko-precedent_2001_107
Supreme Court allows lawyer fee when appeal is not clearly groundless despite lower court dismissal.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:6
Supreme Court quashes conviction for aiding and abetting when principal charges are dismissed due to lack of evidence.
kko-precedent_2015_68
Supreme Court allows appeal against conviction when co-defendant's charge is dismissed due to statute of limitations.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__1414
Court dismisses appeal when free legal aid is already granted in the same criminal proceeding.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A:n oikeudenkäyntiavustajaksi oli määrätty X. Tuomion jälkeen käräjäoikeus peruutti määräyksen ja määräsi avustajaksi Y:n. Sovintoneuvottelujen päätyttyä sovintotarjoukseen A ja Y pyysivät avustajanmääräyksen peruuttamista ja A Z:n määräämistä avustajakseen. Käräjäoikeuden hylättyä pyynnöt hovioikeus peruutti avustajanmääräyksen, mutta hylkäsi A:n pyynnön valituskirjelmän laatineen Z:n määräämisestä uudeksi avustajaksi. Kysymys avustajanmääräyksestä.