Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1615/2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows joint residence decision by parents when one intends to move abroad with child.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1615/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal regarding the division of guardianship tasks. The lower court had ruled that parents must decide jointly on the child's residence if one intends to move abroad with the child. The court found the lower court's interpretation of the Guardianship Act's provisions on joint decision-making to be correct and in the child's best interest. Consequently, the decision requiring joint parental consent for international relocation was upheld.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom; The court established that parents must jointly decide on the child's place of residence when one parent intends to move abroad with the child, ensuring the child's best interests are protected through shared parental authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
joint guardianship decision international relocation child residence parental authority best interests of child Supreme Court of Finland Guardianship Act cambiamento di dimora

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom
L lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1996_1559
Supreme Court defines child abduction indicators under old Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2.
kko-precedent_2004_76
Supreme Court allows return of abducted children to US despite mother's claim of their objection.
kko-precedent_2003_126
Supreme Court holds child custody decisions based on parental agreement must be reviewed under Article 12 of the Child Custody Act.
kko-precedent_1987_82
Supreme Court rules child custody case must be heard where child factually resides, not where social board placed them.
kko-precedent_1995_110
Supreme Court dismisses request to return children to Switzerland, ruling the mother's move was not wrongful retention under Hague Convention.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys yhteishuoltajien tehtävien jakoa koskevasta määräyksestä, jonka mukaan vanhemmat päättävät yhdessä lasten asuinpaikasta siinä tapauksessa, että se vanhemmista, jonka luona lapset asuvat, aikoo muuttaa lasten kanssa ulkomaille.

L lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom