Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2320/2003 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for road damage compensation where road authority negligently filled a manhole while constructing a public road.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2320/2003
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from water leakage caused by a road authority's negligent construction work. The authority had filled a manhole and blocked a pipe while mistakenly treating a private road section as a public road. The court held that the authority was not liable because the plaintiff failed to prove the specific negligence required for compensation under the relevant tort provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki vialle ja sen osille aiheutuvista vahingoista; Vahingonkorvauslaki: The road authority is not liable for damages caused by its construction activities if the plaintiff cannot establish the specific fault or negligence required for compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
road damage compensation negligence in construction public road construction tort liability water leakage damage Supreme Court decision civil compensation vizio di costruzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki vialle ja sen osille aiheutuvista vahingoista
Vahingonkorvauslaki
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1992_130
Municipality liable for flood damage caused by missing backflow valve during joint repair agreement with contractor.
kho-other_2017_3091
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against municipal environmental rules exempting small wastewater discharges from strict groundwater protection.
admin_2004_turku__222
Administrative court dismissed appeal for lack of standing as water quality decision did not directly affect the plaintiff.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__288
Court dismissed claim for damages based on breach of contract due to lack of specific performance request.
kko-precedent_1987_20
Supreme Court dismisses buyer's claim for hidden defect damages where seller could not reasonably detect the nail puncture.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys Tiehallinnon vahingonkorvausvastuusta, kun tiepiiri oli erehdyksessä yleistä tietä tehdessään täyttänyt tiealueella olleen viemäriin liittyvän kaivon ja samalla tukkinut kaivoon tulleen putken, mistä oli aiheutunut kiinteistölle vesivahinkoa.