Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3033/2002 Generato dall'IA

Shareholder associations' appeal dismissed; court ruled they lacked standing to challenge the land survey regarding fishing rights.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3033/2002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the shareholder associations' appeal against a land survey concerning fishing rights on state-owned waters. The associations argued they had no voice in the matter, but the court found the dispute did not concern their rights or representation. Consequently, the lower court's decision was revoked only regarding the state's appeal, leaving the survey valid for the associations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on the Administration of State Property; Act on the Administration of State Property: Shareholder associations lack standing to challenge administrative decisions regarding state property if the dispute does not concern their rights or representation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
shareholder associations standing state property administration fishing rights survey administrative appeal dismissal lack of voice in matter metodo del minimo esistenziale con ripartizione dell'eccedenza difetto di legittimazione trasmissione per incompetenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on the Administration of State Property
Generato dall'IA
admin_1995_water-superior__100
Administrative court dismisses appeal against engineer's decision as no final decision exists for review.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:82
Supreme Court holds neighbor is party to easement if significant environmental impacts affect their property rights.
kho-other_2017_5777
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; drainage company decision upheld under old Water Act transition rules.
admin_2010_vaasa__527
Administrative court has jurisdiction to review cost allocation between separate land surveying operations under Land Surveying Act.
kko-precedent_1993_128
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; land court wrongly examined unappealed reclamation request under Land Division Act.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Järjestäytyneet osakaskunnat olivat pyytäneet kiinteistönmääritystoimitusta sen seikan selvittämiseksi, millä tiloilla oli oikeus käyttää eri taloille vesipiirirajankäyntitoimituksessa vahvistettuja erityisperusteisia oikeuksia kalastukseen ja kalastuspaikkoihin valtion ja erään tilan vesialueella. Toimituksen perusteella oli laadittu osakasluettelot, joissa oli määrätty kalastuspaikoittain sekä talojen välisestä suhteesta että taloista muodostettujen tilojen välisestä suhteesta. Metsähallitus valtion edustajana sekä osakaskunnat valittivat maaoikeuteen. Koska asiassa ei ollut kysymys osakaskuntien edusta tai oikeudesta, maaoikeus jätti niiden valitukset tutkimatta ja kumosi toimitusmiesten ratkaisun siltä osin kuin sitä oli vaadittu metsähallituksen valituksessa. Kysymys siitä, olisiko maaoikeuden tullut kumota toimitus kokonaisuudessaan, koska sitä hakeneilla osakaskunnilla ei ollut asiassa puhevaltaa.