Supreme Court held that instruments used by a composer in their work are not personal security and must be included in debt restructuring.

The Supreme Court ruled that musical instruments used by a composer in their professional work constitute their personal security and must be excluded from debt restructuring proceedings. The debtor argued for a shorter repayment plan, but the court found no grounds to reduce the standard five-year term. Consequently, the court determined that the instruments are essential for the debtor's livelihood and cannot be seized for ordinary debts.