Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1082/2002 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows second parent to deduct significant travel expenses from child support when visitation rights are exercised.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1082/2002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the second parent to deduct substantial travel costs from child support payments. The applicant argued that significant expenses incurred for exercising visitation rights should be offset against the financial obligation. The court ruled that such deductions are permissible when the travel costs are objectively significant and directly linked to the visitation arrangement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 10 §; Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 11 §: The court permits the deduction of significant travel expenses from child support when a parent exercises visitation rights, provided the costs are substantial and directly attributable to the visitation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
child support deduction travel expenses offset visitation rights costs parental travel costs alimony expense reimbursement spese di missione, di trasporto e di alloggio sussidio per le spese di pendolare motivo d'asilo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 10 §
Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 11 §
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1980_vaasa__460
Court allows child support despite voluntary evasion by parent due to special heavy reasons.
kko-other_2023_99
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding child support changes affecting continuation of social assistance allowance.
kko-precedent_1995_50
Supreme Court reduces child support based on lower living costs in Estonia despite Finnish residence.
kko-precedent_1998_4
Supreme Court allows alimony increase when recipient fails to provide income evidence, bearing adverse consequences.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:48
Supreme Court dismisses alimony reduction claim due to significant savings and asset liquidation by the payer.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko toinen vanhemmista vapauttaa maksamasta lapselle elatusapua tapaamisoikeudesta aiheutuvien huomattavien matkakulujen perusteella.