Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2/2001 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal to resume evidence after dismissing late claim due to delay in complaint.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2/2001
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of First Instance dismissed the claim for price reduction and damages without evidence, ruling it was filed too late due to a delayed complaint. The Supreme Court granted the application to resume evidence proceedings to address the delay in filing the complaint. Consequently, the case was remanded for further examination rather than being dismissed outright.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 1 § ja 10. luvun 2 § nojalla hylkäävän tuomion; asianosainen voi pyytää todistelun vastaanottamista viivästyneen reklamaation perusteella.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
late claim dismissal delayed complaint evidence resumption price reduction claim damage compensation Court of First Instance Supreme Court remand pubblicità ingannevole

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 1 §
Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 2 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2002_3169
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's refusal to permit amendment of trial arguments.
kko-other_1999_2183
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding interpretation of objection notice when lower court procedure was erroneous.
kko-other_2005_347
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding search conditions for suspected assault under Criminal Procedure Code.
kko-precedent_2014_45
Supreme Court remands case for main hearing due to insufficient evidence assessment in lower court judgment.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:43
Supreme Court allows retrial for gross debtor dishonesty where reasonable living costs replace business salary as the benchmark for asset transfers.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli ilman todistelua välituomiolla hylännyt hinnanalennus- ja vahingonkorvauskanteen sillä perusteella, että kanne oli nostettu liian myöhään, ja reklamaation viivästymisen perusteella. Kysymys asian palauttamisesta todistelun vastaanottamiseksi reklamaation viivästymisestä sekä asian käsittelyn jatkamiseksi muilta osin.