Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 680/2000 Generato dall'IA

Spousal compensation claim for exclusive use of joint property after divorce dismissed due to lack of fault.

Numero d'incarto KKO 680/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claim for compensation arising from the exclusive use of a jointly owned residence by one spouse after divorce. The plaintiff argued that the remaining spouse's sole occupancy constituted a breach of duty, while the defendant contended that such usage was a normal consequence of the divorce without fault. The court ruled that no legal obligation existed to compensate for the mere fact of exclusive possession absent specific fault or contractual breach.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Marriage Act; Section 10 of the Property Act: A spouse cannot be compelled to pay compensation for the exclusive use of a jointly owned residence after divorce unless specific fault or contractual breach is proven.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
divorce compensation joint property division exclusive residence use spousal fault property law Finland causa di carattere pecuniario deprezzamento della frazione residua diritto esclusivo nella comproprietà

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Marriage Act
Section 10 of the Property Act
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:35
Supreme Court allows eviction of cohabitant from property where sole owner has mortgage and no legal right to stay.
kko-precedent_1995_3
Supreme Court allows partial compensation for improvements made knowingly with unclear title but denies unjust enrichment claim.
kko-precedent_2003_82
Supreme Court rules wife retains half ownership of marital home buildings despite husband's bankruptcy and sole land title.
kko-precedent_1996_54
Supreme Court dismisses spousal housing usage compensation claim under Marriage Act Section 24 as unreasonable.
kko-precedent_1995_98
Divorce decree does not prevent court from issuing order to end cohabitation under Marriage Act s. 24(1).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko puolisoiden määräosin omistamaan yhteiseen asuinkiinteistöön avioeron jälkeen asumaan jäänyt puoliso velvoittaa suorittamaan asunnosta pois muuttaneelle puolisolle korvausta siitä, että asumaan jäänyt puoliso käytti yksin yhteistä omaisuutta.