Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2747/2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed liability claim against road authority for tree branch injury on maintenance road.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2747/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the road authority for injuries sustained from falling tree branches on a maintenance road. The plaintiff argued the road authority failed to maintain the path, while the defendant contended the injury resulted from the plaintiff's own negligence. The court ruled that the road authority had fulfilled its duty to maintain the road in a safe condition, and the plaintiff's failure to exercise due care was the primary cause of the accident.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki vialle ja tielle liittyvistä vahingoista (1993:1003); Vahingonkorvauslaki (1910:1); Tieliikennelaki (1995:1001): The road authority is not liable for injuries caused by natural objects on a maintenance road if the plaintiff failed to exercise due care in their own safety.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
road authority liability maintenance road duty natural objects danger plaintiff contributory negligence tree branch injury light traffic road Supreme Court decision causalità dell'infortunio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki vialle ja tielle liittyvistä vahingoista (1993:1003)
Vahingonkorvauslaki (1910:1)
Tieliikennelaki (1995:1001)
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2011_45
Supreme Court remands case for retrial due to insufficient assessment of significant harm to neighbor's property from road relocation.
appeal_1976_turku__1247
Court convicts driver and passenger for failing to assist a cyclist after a traffic accident under Finnish traffic law.
kko-other_1999_2183
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding interpretation of objection notice when lower court procedure was erroneous.
kko-precedent_2013_15
Supreme Court dismisses false reporting charge against social worker acting in good faith to protect child's rights.
kko-precedent_2012_28
Supreme Court grants retrial for dog owner negligence case due to lack of precedent on liability rules.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Polkupyöräilijä oli loukkaantunut kaatuessaan kevyen liikenteen väylällä olleisiin puun oksiin ja risuihin. Kaatumispaikka oli tietyömaan kohdalla. Kysymys siitä, oliko tielaitos laiminlyönyt pitää väylän kevyttä liikennettä tyydyttävässä kunnossa. Kysymys myös polkupyöräilijän omasta myötävaikutuksesta.