Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2583/2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows compensation for work-related muscle strain treated as occupational disease under Finnish Act on Work-Related Diseases.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2583/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed compensation for a worker who suffered a muscle strain while lifting a heavy cart. The court determined that although the injury was not a formal accident, it equated to a work-related disease under the Act on Work-Related Diseases. Consequently, the claimant was entitled to benefits under the Accident Insurance Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on Work-Related Diseases 1993, Section 1, Paragraph 6; Act on Accident Insurance 1983: Muscle strain caused by work tasks is deemed a work-related disease and qualifies for accident insurance compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work-related disease muscle strain occupational injury compensation entitlement lifting tasks nesso causale del colpo di frusta causalità della lesione alla spalla lesione personale semplice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on Work-Related Diseases 1993, Section 1, Paragraph 6
Act on Accident Insurance 1983
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2001_439
Work injury claim dismissed because pre-existing pain was not a direct cause of the new muscle tear.
kko-other_1997_4250
Supreme Court held that a gap between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae is not a compensable accident consequence under private accident insurance.
insurance_1979_2790-1978
Insurance court dismissed work injury claim for shoulder tear caused by lifting heavy package.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
kko-other_1996_320
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee's own negligence caused the accident.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli työssään nostanut oikealla kädellä painavaa maitokärryä ja saanut oikean hauislihaksen etäisemmän pään jänteen repeämän. Vamma oli aiheutunut todennäköisesti nostoliikkeen seurauksena. A:lla ei todettu muuta vikaa, vammaa tai sairautta, mistä repeämä olisi voinut mahdollisesti aiheutua. Kysymyksessä ei ollut tapaturma mutta vamman katsottiin rinnastuvan eräistä työtapaturmina korvattavista vammoista annetun asetuksen 1 §:n 6 kohdassa tarkoitettuun kipeytymiseen ja oikeuttavan tapaturmavakuutuslain mukaiseen korvaukseen.