Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2273/2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows conviction of a NCO's superior for failing to ensure the driver's duties under Traffic Act s. 61.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2273/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a non-commissioned officer's superior for failing to ensure the driver fulfilled duties under the Traffic Act. The defense argued the superior lacked direct control over the vehicle, but the court found the superior held a duty to supervise the driver's compliance. Consequently, the court ruled that the superior could be held criminally liable for the driver's negligence due to their supervisory role.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic Act s. 61; The superior of a driver is criminally liable for the driver's failure to fulfill statutory duties if the superior failed to ensure the driver's compliance with those duties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Traffic Act s. 61 non-commissioned officer supervisory duty criminal liability driver negligence vehicle operation command responsibility responsabilità per incidente stradale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Traffic Act s. 61
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1995_122
Supreme Court dismisses charge of drunk driving where passenger pulled driver's shirt causing loss of control.
appeal_1983_helsinki__557
Passenger's violent grab from driver convicted of minor assault and traffic negligence despite no driving license.
kko-precedent_1989_15
Passenger using handbrake while drunk convicted of gross driving under influence instead of traffic endangerment.
appeal_1976_turku__1247
Court convicts driver and passenger for failing to assist a cyclist after a traffic accident under Finnish traffic law.
kko-precedent_1990_64
Supreme Court allows conviction of 15-year-old moped passenger for helmet violation under Traffic Act s. 89.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko auton kuljettajana toimineen varusmiehen esimies tuomita tekijänä auton kuljettajalle tieliikennelain 61 §:n mukaan kuuluneiden velvollisuuksien laiminlyömisestä.

TLL 61 §