KKO 1822/2000
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for excessive review, ruling lower court exceeded scope of complaint.
Finlandia (FI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision, finding the lower court had reviewed the case more broadly than the complaint indicated. The appellant argued the review was excessive, but the court determined the lower court's actions fell within permissible bounds. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the procedural scope did not warrant overturning the original judgment.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAKorkein oikeus 100/1996; 100/1996: The Supreme Court held that a lower court's review must be limited to the scope of the complaint, and exceeding this scope does not justify an appeal.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
excessive review
scope of complaint
procedural error
appeal dismissal
lower court review
principio del ne bis in idem
violazione della precedenza
vizio di procedura
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAKorkein oikeus 100/1996
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAappeal_1979_eastern-finland__766
Court upheld conviction for aggravated assault, rejecting reformatio in peius request despite new evidence of life-threatening injury.
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.
kko-other_1998_3079
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding appeal court's failure to examine admissibility of complaint under specific procedural rules.
appeal_1980_rovaniemi__550
Court held two traffic violations constitute one offense when committed in a single act.
kko-other_2016_42
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer case to main hearing on serious drug offenses.
Testo completo
Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus tutkinut jutun laajemmin kuin tyytymättömyyttä oli ilmoitettu.